Skip to main content

Do Our Greivances Mean Anything?

 The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing.

"During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job accidents are fatigue and sleep deprivation among workers. Therefore, to reduce the number of on-the-job accidents at Quiot and thereby increase productivity, we should shorten each of our three work shifts by one hour so that employees will get adequate amounts of sleep."

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

The vice president of Quiot Manufacturing has received a fairly adequate evaluation of the grievances of the workers. The comparison between work hours and on job accidents is quite skillfully linked and is explained reasonably by the inclusion of employee requirements like adequate resting time and fatigue. However, the proposal comes with certain assumptions that bring possible gaps in the argument and considering them would bring about more much needed perspective on the given issue in the memo.

For example, what exactly is the nature of the job where the on-job accidents occur? Additionally, what is the product that these manufacturing sites even produce? If Quiot Manufacturing engages in manufacturing products with complex and hazardous techniques then of course on-job accidents will be caused more often. It does not completely allow such accidents to be normalized but definitely provides a different angle on it. Blaming fatigue and lack of sleep only would be ignoring activity like working near a hot furnace or with a sharp sawblade. In contrast if the opposing Panoply Industries works on less dangerous machines it would explain why the workers require shorter working hours as well. 


On that note, working certain machines differ in skills so many machines require constant labor supervision to make sure of proper functioning and other machines just go about their business in the usual day. If Quiot Manufacturing requires workers to remain for longer to meet demands then there is little that can be done about the job requirements. On top of that, we must also consider the manpower between the two manufacturing plants. If Quiot employs more number of employees and hence produces larger number of goods in shorter number of time it would explain the higher number of accidents as well as it supports proportionally more employees as well. Cutting down on number of employees would also be a viable option to reduce the statistic of on job accidents but that would of course be a fairly unpopular option.




And finally, what proof is presented to attest that lesser working hours would result in lesser fatigue and higher productivity. There is no real study or statistic about it other than hearsay and it can only be inferred that higher productivity can be ‘expected’ but not guaranteed. And for the company to make a gamble on their manufacturing speed and efficiency by sacrificing time is too high of a demand. Especially if a large workforce is involved. A comparative like the one from Panoply Industries would help here for sure. LIke an example of some other manufacturing plant that did in fact experience higher productivity due to better employee satisfaction. But that again, is left to speculation about what is and what could be.


It should be addressed that the employees of Quiot Manufacturing are in fact in harm’s way when their safety is neglected taking into consideration the above points. That is in no way the intention, rather it is well wished to reinforce the idea for better for ergonomic implementation of any action that may be taken regarding the working hours and conditions of the employees. And not only that, the company could also consider adopting practices if possible from Panoply Industries, as 30% is not a meager difference. If Panoply makes use of better, safer equipment, then the company shall look into the adoption of the same. But until these inquiries are satisfied there may not be enough ground to make evident changes to the model that Quiot Industries currently runs on.

Time: 24 mins

Word count: 585
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Ode to Video games

 Boredom can give rise to a lot of things, for me lately, an addiction to writing has really gotten to my head. So here, just a little something I ended up typing to my friend Shruti in a matter of 30 mins when I thought she was offline (But somehow wasn't): Yknow, I want something, that which i cannot say, I want something, that which i cannot describe, I want something, that which i cannot ask for, I want something, something prehistoric, something atavistic, something uncultured, Remnants of a past hobby, Withered, but present, With influence so grand, so emminent, so irresistible One that engenders shivers, goosebumps, and naive exploitable excitement A grating decay of a plane, damp sounds of battering bones and swift stabs that atrophy Explosions that stupor, stories that inspire, and zombies that devour Not trite, not grindy, but one with an end Not limited, not unfathomable, but lovable Addicting, but not degrading Reviving not enervating One that tests skills, not temper a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons in Chemistry (TV and Novel)

  I do not know if anyone is gonna read this, but for context, this and the next 5 reviews were all written on the same day. So apologies if the quality of any of the reviews feels low (me pretending like all the reviews are earth shattering masterpiece essays). I still haven't zeroed in on what I do exactly. I don't review this stuff, because I need to review for someone, writing all this for myself doesn't indicated a review, more like a thought journal. Yea, they're jus thoughts. So what did I think of Lessons in Chemistry? My fingers have an urge to type out "Eh", but the truth is, it's more like "Ew". Let's start with the book, because that's what I picked up first. I saw Lessons in Chemistry being reviewed by my local library. In that review written by Mary I., she says "This story is rich and complex, the characters witty (the good ones) and sometimes unbearable (the bad ones,) and it is guaranteed you will not stop turning th...
Post a Comment
Read more

HuMan's thoughts on Marvel Comics: Ultimatum

If you ever asked a comic enthusiast what he/she thought of the Ultimatum comics, chances are they will probably have hated it, and for good reason. If you haven’t read the comic I strongly recommend for you to read it, obviously not because of how good it is but only to get a taste of what bad writing and terrible art looks like. And if you can’t seem to spare enough time for that, lucky you, I’ve got you covered, just beware mild spoilers ahead (Not that it matters though). Written by Jeph Loeb and art by David Finch, this series of events takes place in the ‘Ultimate Universe’ or Earth-1610. Ever wanted your favorite heroes to have minimal involvement in the plot and experience unnecessarily gruesome deaths? If you said yes, then you are probably an emo and are extremely edgy. Just kidding, if you are reading my blog then you are awesome! Regardless, let’s get down to reviewing. Can’t seem to think of anything but if you are interested in looking at your favorite female cha...
Post a Comment
Read more