Skip to main content

Do Our Greivances Mean Anything?

 The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing.

"During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job accidents are fatigue and sleep deprivation among workers. Therefore, to reduce the number of on-the-job accidents at Quiot and thereby increase productivity, we should shorten each of our three work shifts by one hour so that employees will get adequate amounts of sleep."

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

The vice president of Quiot Manufacturing has received a fairly adequate evaluation of the grievances of the workers. The comparison between work hours and on job accidents is quite skillfully linked and is explained reasonably by the inclusion of employee requirements like adequate resting time and fatigue. However, the proposal comes with certain assumptions that bring possible gaps in the argument and considering them would bring about more much needed perspective on the given issue in the memo.

For example, what exactly is the nature of the job where the on-job accidents occur? Additionally, what is the product that these manufacturing sites even produce? If Quiot Manufacturing engages in manufacturing products with complex and hazardous techniques then of course on-job accidents will be caused more often. It does not completely allow such accidents to be normalized but definitely provides a different angle on it. Blaming fatigue and lack of sleep only would be ignoring activity like working near a hot furnace or with a sharp sawblade. In contrast if the opposing Panoply Industries works on less dangerous machines it would explain why the workers require shorter working hours as well. 


On that note, working certain machines differ in skills so many machines require constant labor supervision to make sure of proper functioning and other machines just go about their business in the usual day. If Quiot Manufacturing requires workers to remain for longer to meet demands then there is little that can be done about the job requirements. On top of that, we must also consider the manpower between the two manufacturing plants. If Quiot employs more number of employees and hence produces larger number of goods in shorter number of time it would explain the higher number of accidents as well as it supports proportionally more employees as well. Cutting down on number of employees would also be a viable option to reduce the statistic of on job accidents but that would of course be a fairly unpopular option.




And finally, what proof is presented to attest that lesser working hours would result in lesser fatigue and higher productivity. There is no real study or statistic about it other than hearsay and it can only be inferred that higher productivity can be ‘expected’ but not guaranteed. And for the company to make a gamble on their manufacturing speed and efficiency by sacrificing time is too high of a demand. Especially if a large workforce is involved. A comparative like the one from Panoply Industries would help here for sure. LIke an example of some other manufacturing plant that did in fact experience higher productivity due to better employee satisfaction. But that again, is left to speculation about what is and what could be.


It should be addressed that the employees of Quiot Manufacturing are in fact in harm’s way when their safety is neglected taking into consideration the above points. That is in no way the intention, rather it is well wished to reinforce the idea for better for ergonomic implementation of any action that may be taken regarding the working hours and conditions of the employees. And not only that, the company could also consider adopting practices if possible from Panoply Industries, as 30% is not a meager difference. If Panoply makes use of better, safer equipment, then the company shall look into the adoption of the same. But until these inquiries are satisfied there may not be enough ground to make evident changes to the model that Quiot Industries currently runs on.

Time: 24 mins

Word count: 585
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HuMan's thoughts on: George Orwell's 1984

Recently, I had a quick fleeting recommendation to peruse George Orwell's 1984. Its increasing relevance in today's time period as social media sites and technology aim to do precisely that which is described in this book contains more forethought than one would expect from a writer during the industrial revolution. So I picked it up, as in, I downloaded an epub file from the internet and employed my trustee Google Books app to create a simulation of the book on my phone and completed it in a mere 5 days. Without giving too much away, the base premise basically describes modern-day China. In that, every single person living is under a regime that is constantly watching them. 1984 has a slight bit of confusion though.  Before it can really embed itself upon me as genuinely being a good book, it first has to decide what kind of book it is. 1984 takes ample time and liberal descriptions to describe each and every contemplation of thought that goes on in our protagonist's mind
Post a Comment
Read more

An Ode to Video games

 Boredom can give rise to a lot of things, for me lately, an addiction to writing has really gotten to my head. So here, just a little something I ended up typing to my friend Shruti in a matter of 30 mins when I thought she was offline (But somehow wasn't): Yknow, I want something, that which i cannot say, I want something, that which i cannot describe, I want something, that which i cannot ask for, I want something, something prehistoric, something atavistic, something uncultured, Remnants of a past hobby, Withered, but present, With influence so grand, so emminent, so irresistible One that engenders shivers, goosebumps, and naive exploitable excitement A grating decay of a plane, damp sounds of battering bones and swift stabs that atrophy Explosions that stupor, stories that inspire, and zombies that devour Not trite, not grindy, but one with an end Not limited, not unfathomable, but lovable Addicting, but not degrading Reviving not enervating One that tests skills, not temper a
Post a Comment
Read more

HuMan's Book Review: Go Suck a Lemon by Michael Cornwall

  Going through life's ups and downs one eventually in today's times resorts to self help books. Prior to this one I read The Secret. The main point of The Secret over its entire run was to think positive and to think of only good outcomes and to manifest it to yourself. Letting the power of the universe serve you. Go Suck a Lemon isn't much different. Repeating one ideal over and over again till it embeds itself into your natural thinking and instincts seems to be a pattern that works pretty effectively. However while The Secret comprehensively bombards you with examples from all walks of life and all accounts of individuals from various backgrounds who are all in their own right successful, Go Suck a Lemon is a much more personal account of Dr. Micharl Cornwall. So much so it also includes a whole chapter deticated to his down syndrome sister who taught him a good few lessons on emotional intelligence. The mantra repeated in this book is of taking ownership of our emotion
Post a Comment
Read more