Skip to main content

HuMan's thoughts on: George Orwell's 1984


Recently, I had a quick fleeting recommendation to peruse George Orwell's 1984. Its increasing relevance in today's time period as social media sites and technology aim to do precisely that which is described in this book contains more forethought than one would expect from a writer during the industrial revolution. So I picked it up, as in, I downloaded an epub file from the internet and employed my trustee Google Books app to create a simulation of the book on my phone and completed it in a mere 5 days. Without giving too much away, the base premise basically describes modern-day China. In that, every single person living is under a regime that is constantly watching them. 1984 has a slight bit of confusion though. 

Before it can really embed itself upon me as genuinely being a good book, it first has to decide what kind of book it is. 1984 takes ample time and liberal descriptions to describe each and every contemplation of thought that goes on in our protagonist's mind while simultaneously frequently referring to a police force quite literally called the 'thought police'. This contradiction while complements the book's consistency, it doesn't add up to the part where I have to describe it. It engages in writing a biopic of the surrounding world and effectively juxtaposing it with our own world of false beliefs, but then it also incorporates a doomed story of love and hope. It shows us that where there is injustice there will be some sort of upheaval, and where there is trust there will be betrayal. All these contradictions again, complement the themes within the book. The governing bodies, for example, are named the Ministry of Truth (that alters past and reality), the Ministry of Love (that tortures 'criminals'), the Ministry of Peace (facilitates war), and the Ministry of Plenty (facilitates depleting rations). The whole book relies on the concept of claiming to be something and being something else, and that involves this book itself, claiming to be a work of fiction but providing a very real description of our world today.

From my own personal knowledge before actually reading the book, I knew some knowledge about it, by which I mean I knew most of the stuff the book revolves around. See, the world the story is set in is somehow more powerful than the actual story. A quick summary, the book opens with an introduction of our protagonist; Winston Smith leading a particularly borish life, but it was all about to change as Winston takes up the crime of writing down his thoughts (gasp!). Well, according to the book even having those thoughts was a crime but Winston was (apparently) quite good at hiding it. From there Winston dreams of rising against the regime and breaking all the systemic abuse and malpractice employed by the 'Party'. The rest is a story you may explore if you wish as I wouldn't want to give away plot points even if they are to be honest, quite underwhelming. 

You may however, read 1984 for the vivid descriptions of the world inhabited by people like Winston. The intricate details and deep understanding of a dystopia pretending to be uptopia very comfortably mix with each other to produce a world that is quite literally China right now. As described above the whole world runs on contradictions, and there is even a point in the story when the protagonist gets a hold of a handbook for rebels and it contains within it long descriptions of lies that speak against the party. In hindsight, the purpose of that scene and situation miss me now because it made no sense for him to be in that situation at all but alas, I assume George just wanted to flex just how deep he could dive into his own fictional world and pretend like he was the God running each and every strand of the world in 1984.

All in all, this is the book for you if the book you are looking for is a lengthy description of a world you may soon come to experience. If a good story is what you are looking for though, Je desole. If you are an author, I guess it would do you some good as you can always take pointers in world building from George Orwell.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do Our Greivances Mean Anything?

  The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing. "During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job accidents are fatigue and sleep deprivation among workers. Therefore, to reduce the number of on-the-job accidents at Quiot and thereby increase productivity, we should shorten each of our three work shifts by one hour so that employees will get adequate amounts of sleep." Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted. The vice president of Quiot Manufacturing has received a fairly adequate evaluation of the grievances of the workers. The comparison betwee...

Superman 2025

Superman is a classic superhero. He has been around for almost a century and provided inspiration to children and adults alike. He has a certain righteousness that is unparalleled by any other superhero I have ever read about. He isn’t the best or most interesting superhero, but Superman carries himself in a status that isn’t built as easily as other people think. In this essay I will iterate why I think Superman is the morally best superhero and why being him is difficult. (And some thoughts on the 2025 movie) The most memorable thing about superheroes will always be their origin stories. Spiderman had uncle ben, Batman has his parents, and the Flash has his mom. Superman has no real tragedies that motivate him against evil. He has two healthy parents who just raised him to be a good person. Sure, he lost his entire civilization of Krypton, but he was a baby when it happened and maybe he may feel alienated (pun intended), but he cannot feel traumatized enough to do good because of tha...

Oppenheimer

  Ok, this might be my 4th draft of today. If I can't keep writing, it might be fatigue. But if I can, that's great too. (Ok yea, I am on the second paragraph, and I am definitely fatigued. Let's stick to one review per day.) Oppenheimer, I got to this move too late, I know. I watched it a whole year after the Barbenheimer thing happened. I saw Barbie sometime in fall last semester, but only now resolved to finally watch Oppenheimer. In my defense, it is a long commitment. 3 hours. Some old hindi movies used to be 3 hours and I could rarely tolerate those. I still remember how long the songs were in Munna bhai and Lage raho munna bhai. Regardless, now that I have sat through three hours of this beauty, what do I think? I think it was hella artsy. I haven't seen a movie this artsy since I used to keep oscar movies checklists back in 2019. I used to watch all the oscar nominated movies, and I would feel like a true connoisseur of sorts.